[llvm] [NewPM] Port x86-indirect-branch-tracking (PR #179874)

[via llvm-commits]

github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->


:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff origin/main HEAD --extensions cpp,h -- llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86.h llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86CodeGenPassBuilder.cpp llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86IndirectBranchTracking.cpp llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp --diff_from_common_commit
``````````

:warning:
The reproduction instructions above might return results for more than one PR
in a stack if you are using a stacked PR workflow. You can limit the results by
changing `origin/main` to the base branch/commit you want to compare against.
:warning:

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86IndirectBranchTracking.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86IndirectBranchTracking.cpp
index a45a66237..faf8bc5f5 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86IndirectBranchTracking.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86IndirectBranchTracking.cpp
@@ -113,7 +113,6 @@ static bool needsPrologueENDBR(MachineFunction &MF, const Module *M) {
 
 static bool runIndirectBranchTracking(MachineFunction &MF) {
 
-
   const Module *M = MF.getFunction().getParent();
   // Check that the cf-protection-branch is enabled.
   Metadata *isCFProtectionSupported = M->getModuleFlag("cf-protection-branch");

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/179874