[llvm] [BOLT] Fix isCallCoveredByBTI and insertBTI assertions (PR #174600)

[Gergely Bálint via llvm-commits]

https://github.com/bgergely0 created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/174600

Use MCPlus::getNumPrimeOperands to check number of non-annotation
operands instead of getNumOperands.

>From 15dcecaac3696660b001dcc3dc85be0d051c910b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gergely Balint <gergely.balint at arm.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2026 14:43:00 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] [BOLT] Fix isCallCoveredByBTI and insertBTI assertions

Use MCPlus::getNumPrimeOperands to check number of non-annotation
operands instead of getNumOperands.
---
 bolt/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64MCPlusBuilder.cpp | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/bolt/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64MCPlusBuilder.cpp b/bolt/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64MCPlusBuilder.cpp
index 03fb4ddc2f238..a30799d5f45d3 100644
--- a/bolt/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64MCPlusBuilder.cpp
+++ b/bolt/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64MCPlusBuilder.cpp
@@ -2818,7 +2818,7 @@ class AArch64MCPlusBuilder : public MCPlusBuilder {
     // x16 or x17. If the operand is not x16 or x17, it can be accepted by a BTI
     // j or BTI jc (and not BTI c).
     if (isIndirectBranch(Call)) {
-      assert(Call.getNumOperands() == 1 &&
+      assert(MCPlus::getNumPrimeOperands(Call) == 1 &&
              "Indirect branch needs to have 1 operand.");
       assert(Call.getOperand(0).isReg() &&
              "Indirect branch does not have a register operand.");
@@ -2856,7 +2856,7 @@ class AArch64MCPlusBuilder : public MCPlusBuilder {
     // x16 or x17. If the operand is not x16 or x17, it can be accepted by a
     // BTI j or BTI jc (and not BTI c).
     if (isIndirectBranch(Call)) {
-      assert(Call.getNumOperands() == 1 &&
+      assert(MCPlus::getNumPrimeOperands(Call) == 1 &&
              "Indirect branch needs to have 1 operand.");
       assert(Call.getOperand(0).isReg() &&
              "Indirect branch does not have a register operand.");