[llvm] [LangRef] make consequences of NaN rules for pow(i) more explicit (PR #170177)

Eli Friedman via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Dec 3 10:29:11 PST 2025

Previous message: [llvm] [LangRef] make consequences of NaN rules for pow(i) more explicit (PR #170177)
Next message: [llvm] [LangRef] make consequences of NaN rules for pow(i) more explicit (PR #170177)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

https://github.com/efriedma-quic approved this pull request.

LGTM

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/170177

Previous message: [llvm] [LangRef] make consequences of NaN rules for pow(i) more explicit (PR #170177)
Next message: [llvm] [LangRef] make consequences of NaN rules for pow(i) more explicit (PR #170177)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the llvm-commits mailing list