[llvm] [LangRef] make consequences of NaN rules for pow(i) more explicit (PR #170177)

Joshua Cranmer via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Dec 2 15:25:47 PST 2025

Previous message: [llvm] [LangRef] make consequences of NaN rules for pow(i) more explicit (PR #170177)
Next message: [llvm] [LangRef] make consequences of NaN rules for pow(i) more explicit (PR #170177)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

https://github.com/jcranmer-intel edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/170177

Previous message: [llvm] [LangRef] make consequences of NaN rules for pow(i) more explicit (PR #170177)
Next message: [llvm] [LangRef] make consequences of NaN rules for pow(i) more explicit (PR #170177)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the llvm-commits mailing list