[llvm] [VPlan] Use SCEV to prove non-aliasing for stores at different offsets. (PR #170347)
Ramkumar Ramachandra via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Dec 2 11:55:35 PST 2025
================
@@ -139,14 +139,54 @@ bool VPlanTransforms::tryToConvertVPInstructionsToVPRecipes(
return true;
}
+// Return true if \p A and \p B are known to not alias for all VFs in the plan,
+// checked via the distance between the accesses
+static bool isNoAliasViaDistance(VPReplicateRecipe *A, VPReplicateRecipe *B,
+ ScalarEvolution &SE, const Loop &L,
+ VPTypeAnalysis &TypeInfo) {
+ if (A->getOpcode() != Instruction::Store ||
+ B->getOpcode() != Instruction::Store)
+ return false;
+
+ VPValue *AddrA = A->getOperand(1);
+ const SCEV *SCEVA = vputils::getSCEVExprForVPValue(AddrA, SE, &L);
+ VPValue *AddrB = B->getOperand(1);
+ const SCEV *SCEVB = vputils::getSCEVExprForVPValue(AddrB, SE, &L);
+ if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(SCEVA) || isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(SCEVB))
+ return false;
+
+ const SCEV *Distance = SE.getMinusSCEV(SCEVA, SCEVB);
+ auto *ConstDist = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(Distance);
+ if (!ConstDist)
+ return false;
----------------
artagnon wrote:
```suggestion
const APInt *ConstDist;
if (!match(Distance, m_scev_APInt(ConstDist)))
return false;
```
... and strip the subsequent DistValue?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/170347
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list