[llvm] [LangRef] make consequences of NaN rules for pow(i) more explicit (PR #170177)

[Matt Arsenault via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -16831,6 +16836,11 @@ trapping or setting ``errno``.
 When specified with the fast-math-flag 'afn', the result may be approximated
 using a less accurate calculation.
 
+Note that due to how :ref:`LLVM treats NaN values <floatnan>`, the special cases
----------------
arsenm wrote:

I don't see the issue; how is this nondeterministic? The signalingness shouldn't matter, the special cases don't need to do anything with the nan argument 

`pow(+1, exponent) returns 1 for any exponent, even when exponent is NaN`
`pow(base, ±0) returns 1 for any base, even when base is NaN`



https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/170177