[llvm] expandFMINIMUM_FMAXIMUM: FMAXNUM/FMINNUM treat +0>-0 (PR #137367)

Matt Arsenault via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Dec 1 22:20:33 PST 2025 

arsenm wrote:

> Seeļ¼š#168838

This was reverted, and the contentious part is signaling nan handling. One of the reasons simply reverting this is wrong is the signed zero behavior should remain regardless of that 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137367

More information about the llvm-commits mailing list