[llvm] [llvm] Issues found PVS studio static analyzer. LoopUnrollAndJam.cpp (PR #170162)
via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Dec 1 08:41:24 PST 2025
Bhuvan1527 wrote:
> How does this preserve the existing semantics or serve as an optimization in any way?
Hi @boomanaiden154
Well, I went with the logic that,
When var J = I, then we are checking the dependency of an instruction with itself, is that check even necessary?
So, this will save the existing semantics. I even ran all the llvm tests before raising the pr.
And the optimization can be reducing an iteration of J loop I believe.
Would love to discuss more, if you have question. I'm new to LLVM. So lets learn.
Thanks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/170162
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list