[llvm] [AMDGPU] Support image atomic no return instructions (PR #150742)
Harrison Hao via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Sep 19 01:12:28 PDT 2025
================
@@ -8752,16 +8752,24 @@ SDValue SITargetLowering::lowerImage(SDValue Op,
SDLoc DL(Op);
MachineFunction &MF = DAG.getMachineFunction();
const GCNSubtarget *ST = &MF.getSubtarget<GCNSubtarget>();
+ unsigned IntrOpcode = Intr->BaseOpcode;
+ if (!Op.getNode()->hasAnyUseOfValue(0)) {
+ if (Intr->NoRetBaseOpcode != 0 && Intr->NoRetBaseOpcode != Intr->BaseOpcode)
+ IntrOpcode = Intr->NoRetBaseOpcode;
+ }
const AMDGPU::MIMGBaseOpcodeInfo *BaseOpcode =
- AMDGPU::getMIMGBaseOpcodeInfo(Intr->BaseOpcode);
+ AMDGPU::getMIMGBaseOpcodeInfo(IntrOpcode);
const AMDGPU::MIMGDimInfo *DimInfo = AMDGPU::getMIMGDimInfo(Intr->Dim);
- unsigned IntrOpcode = Intr->BaseOpcode;
bool IsGFX10Plus = AMDGPU::isGFX10Plus(*Subtarget);
bool IsGFX11Plus = AMDGPU::isGFX11Plus(*Subtarget);
bool IsGFX12Plus = AMDGPU::isGFX12Plus(*Subtarget);
SmallVector<EVT, 3> ResultTypes(Op->values());
SmallVector<EVT, 3> OrigResultTypes(Op->values());
+ if (BaseOpcode->NoReturn && BaseOpcode->Atomic) {
+ ResultTypes.clear();
+ ResultTypes.push_back(MVT::Other);
----------------
harrisonGPU wrote:
I think we don’t need to modify OrigResultTypes. If we changed it, poison(OrigResultTypes[0]) would cause a type mismatch.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150742
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list