[llvm] [RISCV] add computeKnownBitsForTargetNode for RISCVISD::SRLW (PR #155995)

Simon Pilgrim via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Sep 3 06:13:57 PDT 2025


https://github.com/RKSimon updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/155995

>From 7c8e165ca068cb9508928ed76611cc0582c0ef70 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shreeyash Pandey <shreeyash335 at gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 16:59:13 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [RISCV] add computeKnownBitsForTargetNode for
 RISCVISD::SRLW

Signed-off-by: Shreeyash Pandey <shreeyash335 at gmail.com>
---
 llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp   |   9 ++
 llvm/unittests/Target/RISCV/CMakeLists.txt    |   1 +
 .../Target/RISCV/RISCVSelectionDAGTest.cpp    | 109 ++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 119 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 llvm/unittests/Target/RISCV/RISCVSelectionDAGTest.cpp

diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp
index 4a1db80076530..6dacd83bfe550 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp
@@ -21340,6 +21340,15 @@ void RISCVTargetLowering::computeKnownBitsForTargetNode(const SDValue Op,
     Known = Known.sext(BitWidth);
     break;
   }
+  case RISCVISD::SRLW: {
+    KnownBits Known2;
+    Known = DAG.computeKnownBits(Op.getOperand(0), DemandedElts, Depth + 1);
+    Known2 = DAG.computeKnownBits(Op.getOperand(1), DemandedElts, Depth + 1);
+    Known = KnownBits::lshr(Known.trunc(32), Known2.trunc(5).zext(32));
+    // Restore the original width by sign extending.
+    Known = Known.sext(BitWidth);
+    break;
+  }
   case RISCVISD::CTZW: {
     KnownBits Known2 = DAG.computeKnownBits(Op.getOperand(0), Depth + 1);
     unsigned PossibleTZ = Known2.trunc(32).countMaxTrailingZeros();
diff --git a/llvm/unittests/Target/RISCV/CMakeLists.txt b/llvm/unittests/Target/RISCV/CMakeLists.txt
index 8da8c3896faf1..701bbee55da71 100644
--- a/llvm/unittests/Target/RISCV/CMakeLists.txt
+++ b/llvm/unittests/Target/RISCV/CMakeLists.txt
@@ -19,4 +19,5 @@ set(LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS
 add_llvm_target_unittest(RISCVTests
   MCInstrAnalysisTest.cpp
   RISCVInstrInfoTest.cpp
+  RISCVSelectionDAGTest.cpp
   )
diff --git a/llvm/unittests/Target/RISCV/RISCVSelectionDAGTest.cpp b/llvm/unittests/Target/RISCV/RISCVSelectionDAGTest.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..a13f88484c00c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/unittests/Target/RISCV/RISCVSelectionDAGTest.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "RISCVISelLowering.h"
+#include "llvm/Analysis/OptimizationRemarkEmitter.h"
+#include "llvm/AsmParser/Parser.h"
+#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineModuleInfo.h"
+#include "llvm/CodeGen/SelectionDAG.h"
+#include "llvm/CodeGen/TargetLowering.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/MDBuilder.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/Module.h"
+#include "llvm/MC/TargetRegistry.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/KnownBits.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/SourceMgr.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/TargetSelect.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
+#include "llvm/Target/TargetMachine.h"
+#include "gtest/gtest.h"
+
+namespace llvm {
+
+class RISCVSelectionDAGTest : public testing::Test {
+
+protected:
+  static void SetUpTestCase() {
+    LLVMInitializeRISCVTargetInfo();
+    LLVMInitializeRISCVTarget();
+    LLVMInitializeRISCVTargetMC();
+  }
+
+  void SetUp() override {
+    StringRef Assembly = "define void @f() { ret void }";
+
+    Triple TargetTriple("riscv64", "unknown", "linux");
+
+    std::string Error;
+    const Target *T = TargetRegistry::lookupTarget("", TargetTriple, Error);
+
+    TargetOptions Options;
+    TM = std::unique_ptr<TargetMachine>(T->createTargetMachine(
+        TargetTriple, "generic", "", Options, std::nullopt, std::nullopt,
+        CodeGenOptLevel::Default));
+
+    SMDiagnostic SMError;
+    M = parseAssemblyString(Assembly, SMError, Context);
+    if (!M)
+      report_fatal_error(SMError.getMessage());
+    M->setDataLayout(TM->createDataLayout());
+
+    F = M->getFunction("f");
+    if (!F)
+      report_fatal_error("Function 'f' not found");
+
+    MachineModuleInfo MMI(TM.get());
+
+    MF = std::make_unique<MachineFunction>(*F, *TM, *TM->getSubtargetImpl(*F),
+                                           MMI.getContext(), /*FunctionNum*/ 0);
+
+    DAG = std::make_unique<SelectionDAG>(*TM, CodeGenOptLevel::None);
+    if (!DAG)
+      report_fatal_error("SelectionDAG allocation failed");
+
+    OptimizationRemarkEmitter ORE(F);
+    DAG->init(*MF, ORE, /*LibInfo*/ nullptr, /*AA*/ nullptr,
+              /*AC*/ nullptr, /*MDT*/ nullptr, /*MSDT*/ nullptr, MMI, nullptr);
+  }
+
+  LLVMContext Context;
+  std::unique_ptr<TargetMachine> TM;
+  std::unique_ptr<Module> M;
+  Function *F = nullptr;
+  std::unique_ptr<MachineFunction> MF;
+  std::unique_ptr<SelectionDAG> DAG;
+};
+
+/// SRLW: Logical Shift Right
+TEST_F(RISCVSelectionDAGTest, computeKnownBits_SRLW) {
+  // Following DAG is created from this IR snippet:
+  //
+  // define i64 @f(i32 %x, i32 %y) {
+  //  %a = and i32 %x, 2147483647  ; zeros the MSB for %x
+  //  %b = lshr i32 %a, %y
+  //  %c = zext i32 %b to i64 ; makes the most significant 32 bits 0
+  //  ret i64 %c
+  // }
+  SDLoc Loc;
+  auto IntVT = EVT::getIntegerVT(Context, 32);
+  auto Int64VT = EVT::getIntegerVT(Context, 64);
+  auto Px = DAG->getRegister(0, IntVT);
+  auto Py = DAG->getConstant(2147483647, Loc, IntVT);
+  auto N1 = DAG->getNode(ISD::AND, Loc, IntVT, Px, Py);
+  auto Qx = DAG->getRegister(0, IntVT);
+  auto N2 = DAG->getNode(ISD::SRL, Loc, IntVT, N1, Qx);
+  auto N3 = DAG->getNode(ISD::ZERO_EXTEND, Loc, Int64VT, N2);
+  // N1 = 0???????????????????????????????
+  // N2 = 0???????????????????????????????
+  // N3 = 000000000000000000000000000000000???????????????????????????????
+  // After zero extend, we expect 33 most significant zeros to be known:
+  // 32 from sign extension and 1 from AND operation
+  KnownBits Known = DAG->computeKnownBits(N3);
+  EXPECT_EQ(Known.Zero, APInt(64, -2147483648));
+  EXPECT_EQ(Known.One, APInt(64, 0));
+}
+
+} // end namespace llvm

>From d713682b7a6a5fcc81428ae2fcc958d14f83e770 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shreeyash Pandey <shreeyash335 at gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2025 17:36:17 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 2/6] [RISCV] use RISCVISD::SRLW instead of the generic ISD:SRL

Signed-off-by: Shreeyash Pandey <shreeyash335 at gmail.com>
---
 llvm/unittests/Target/RISCV/RISCVSelectionDAGTest.cpp | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/llvm/unittests/Target/RISCV/RISCVSelectionDAGTest.cpp b/llvm/unittests/Target/RISCV/RISCVSelectionDAGTest.cpp
index a13f88484c00c..c6779e6f7b86a 100644
--- a/llvm/unittests/Target/RISCV/RISCVSelectionDAGTest.cpp
+++ b/llvm/unittests/Target/RISCV/RISCVSelectionDAGTest.cpp
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
 
 #include "RISCVISelLowering.h"
+#include "RISCVSelectionDAGInfo.h"
 #include "llvm/Analysis/OptimizationRemarkEmitter.h"
 #include "llvm/AsmParser/Parser.h"
 #include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineModuleInfo.h"
@@ -94,7 +95,7 @@ TEST_F(RISCVSelectionDAGTest, computeKnownBits_SRLW) {
   auto Py = DAG->getConstant(2147483647, Loc, IntVT);
   auto N1 = DAG->getNode(ISD::AND, Loc, IntVT, Px, Py);
   auto Qx = DAG->getRegister(0, IntVT);
-  auto N2 = DAG->getNode(ISD::SRL, Loc, IntVT, N1, Qx);
+  auto N2 = DAG->getNode(RISCVISD::SRLW, Loc, IntVT, N1, Qx);
   auto N3 = DAG->getNode(ISD::ZERO_EXTEND, Loc, Int64VT, N2);
   // N1 = 0???????????????????????????????
   // N2 = 0???????????????????????????????

>From f3833cd75cc20f231c4f6dd2f32790eaad8922b1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shreeyash Pandey <shreeyash335 at gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2025 22:49:49 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] [RISCV] make SRLW io types be 64 bits

Signed-off-by: Shreeyash Pandey <shreeyash335 at gmail.com>
---
 llvm/unittests/Target/RISCV/RISCVSelectionDAGTest.cpp | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/llvm/unittests/Target/RISCV/RISCVSelectionDAGTest.cpp b/llvm/unittests/Target/RISCV/RISCVSelectionDAGTest.cpp
index c6779e6f7b86a..55fe665dcbadd 100644
--- a/llvm/unittests/Target/RISCV/RISCVSelectionDAGTest.cpp
+++ b/llvm/unittests/Target/RISCV/RISCVSelectionDAGTest.cpp
@@ -94,8 +94,8 @@ TEST_F(RISCVSelectionDAGTest, computeKnownBits_SRLW) {
   auto Px = DAG->getRegister(0, IntVT);
   auto Py = DAG->getConstant(2147483647, Loc, IntVT);
   auto N1 = DAG->getNode(ISD::AND, Loc, IntVT, Px, Py);
-  auto Qx = DAG->getRegister(0, IntVT);
-  auto N2 = DAG->getNode(RISCVISD::SRLW, Loc, IntVT, N1, Qx);
+  auto Qx = DAG->getRegister(0, Int64VT);
+  auto N2 = DAG->getNode(RISCVISD::SRLW, Loc, Int64VT, N1, Qx);
   auto N3 = DAG->getNode(ISD::ZERO_EXTEND, Loc, Int64VT, N2);
   // N1 = 0???????????????????????????????
   // N2 = 0???????????????????????????????

>From 04eb8c3626eb85041949a084b51549fcf865ec79 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shreeyash Pandey <shreeyash335 at gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2025 16:42:54 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] [RISCV] re-write DAG generation based on actual DAG
 output

Signed-off-by: Shreeyash Pandey <shreeyash335 at gmail.com>
---
 .../Target/RISCV/RISCVSelectionDAGTest.cpp    | 58 +++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/llvm/unittests/Target/RISCV/RISCVSelectionDAGTest.cpp b/llvm/unittests/Target/RISCV/RISCVSelectionDAGTest.cpp
index 55fe665dcbadd..f9e3416076b49 100644
--- a/llvm/unittests/Target/RISCV/RISCVSelectionDAGTest.cpp
+++ b/llvm/unittests/Target/RISCV/RISCVSelectionDAGTest.cpp
@@ -80,28 +80,52 @@ class RISCVSelectionDAGTest : public testing::Test {
 
 /// SRLW: Logical Shift Right
 TEST_F(RISCVSelectionDAGTest, computeKnownBits_SRLW) {
-  // Following DAG is created from this IR snippet:
+  // Given the following IR snippet:
+  //  define i64 @f(i32 %x, i32 %y) {
+  //   %a = and i32 %x, 2147483647  ; zeros the MSB for %x
+  //   %b = lshr i32 %a, %y
+  //   %c = zext i32 %b to i64 ; makes the most significant 32 bits 0
+  //   ret i64 %c
+  //  }
+  // The Optimized SelectionDAG as show by llc -mtriple="riscv64" -debug-only=isel-dump 
+  // is:
+  //      t0: ch,glue = EntryToken
+  //          t2: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %0
+  //        t18: i64 = and t2, Constant:i64<2147483647>
+  //        t4: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %1
+  //      t20: i64 = RISCVISD::SRLW t18, t4
+  //    t22: i64 = and t20, Constant:i64<4294967295>
+  //  t13: ch,glue = CopyToReg t0, Register:i64 $x10, t22
+  //  t14: ch = RISCVISD::RET_GLUE t13, Register:i64 $x10, t13:1
   //
-  // define i64 @f(i32 %x, i32 %y) {
-  //  %a = and i32 %x, 2147483647  ; zeros the MSB for %x
-  //  %b = lshr i32 %a, %y
-  //  %c = zext i32 %b to i64 ; makes the most significant 32 bits 0
-  //  ret i64 %c
-  // }
+  // The DAG created below is derived from this
   SDLoc Loc;
-  auto IntVT = EVT::getIntegerVT(Context, 32);
   auto Int64VT = EVT::getIntegerVT(Context, 64);
-  auto Px = DAG->getRegister(0, IntVT);
-  auto Py = DAG->getConstant(2147483647, Loc, IntVT);
-  auto N1 = DAG->getNode(ISD::AND, Loc, IntVT, Px, Py);
+  auto Px = DAG->getRegister(0, Int64VT);
+  auto Py = DAG->getConstant(2147483647, Loc, Int64VT);
+  auto N1 = DAG->getNode(ISD::AND, Loc, Int64VT, Px, Py);
   auto Qx = DAG->getRegister(0, Int64VT);
   auto N2 = DAG->getNode(RISCVISD::SRLW, Loc, Int64VT, N1, Qx);
-  auto N3 = DAG->getNode(ISD::ZERO_EXTEND, Loc, Int64VT, N2);
-  // N1 = 0???????????????????????????????
-  // N2 = 0???????????????????????????????
-  // N3 = 000000000000000000000000000000000???????????????????????????????
-  // After zero extend, we expect 33 most significant zeros to be known:
-  // 32 from sign extension and 1 from AND operation
+  auto Py2 = DAG->getConstant(4294967295, Loc, Int64VT);
+  auto N3 = DAG->getNode(ISD::AND, Loc, Int64VT, N2, Py2);
+  // N1 = Px & 0x7FFFFFFF
+  // The first AND ensures that the input to the shift has bit 31 cleared.
+  // This means bits [63:31] of N1 are known to be zero.
+  //
+  // N2 = SRLW N1, Qx
+  // SRLW performs a 32-bit logical right shift and then sign-extends the
+  // 32-bit result to 64 bits. Because we know N1's bit 31 is 0, the
+  // 32-bit result of the shift will also have its sign bit (bit 31) as 0.
+  // Therefore, the sign-extension is guaranteed to be a zero-extension.
+  //
+  // N3 = N2 & 0xFFFFFFFF
+  // This second AND is part of the canonical pattern to clear the upper
+  // 32 bits, explicitly performing the zero-extension. From a KnownBits
+  // perspective, it's redundant, as N2's upper bits are already known zero.
+  //
+  // As a result, for N3, we know the upper 32 bits are zero (from the effective
+  // zero-extension) and we also know bit 31 is zero (from the initial AND).
+  // This gives us 33 known most-significant zero bits.
   KnownBits Known = DAG->computeKnownBits(N3);
   EXPECT_EQ(Known.Zero, APInt(64, -2147483648));
   EXPECT_EQ(Known.One, APInt(64, 0));

>From 69d9c85f542a067252bf91fd8361e3bba797f3ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shreeyash Pandey <shreeyash335 at gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 15:44:03 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] [RISCV] fix formatting for RISCVSelectionDAGTest.cpp

Signed-off-by: Shreeyash Pandey <shreeyash335 at gmail.com>
---
 llvm/unittests/Target/RISCV/RISCVSelectionDAGTest.cpp | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/llvm/unittests/Target/RISCV/RISCVSelectionDAGTest.cpp b/llvm/unittests/Target/RISCV/RISCVSelectionDAGTest.cpp
index f9e3416076b49..f6b8ca7256554 100644
--- a/llvm/unittests/Target/RISCV/RISCVSelectionDAGTest.cpp
+++ b/llvm/unittests/Target/RISCV/RISCVSelectionDAGTest.cpp
@@ -87,8 +87,8 @@ TEST_F(RISCVSelectionDAGTest, computeKnownBits_SRLW) {
   //   %c = zext i32 %b to i64 ; makes the most significant 32 bits 0
   //   ret i64 %c
   //  }
-  // The Optimized SelectionDAG as show by llc -mtriple="riscv64" -debug-only=isel-dump 
-  // is:
+  // The Optimized SelectionDAG as show by llc -mtriple="riscv64"
+  // -debug-only=isel-dump is:
   //      t0: ch,glue = EntryToken
   //          t2: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %0
   //        t18: i64 = and t2, Constant:i64<2147483647>

>From 14cc218fd603581ce997bbc9f61c4e10a25741d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shreeyash Pandey <shreeyash335 at gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 17:33:26 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] [RISCV] add a missing brace in RISCVISelLowering.cpp

Signed-off-by: Shreeyash Pandey <shreeyash335 at gmail.com>
---
 llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp
index 7fc26c6999b9e..b5e493691f6a4 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp
@@ -21387,6 +21387,7 @@ void RISCVTargetLowering::computeKnownBitsForTargetNode(const SDValue Op,
     // Restore the original width by sign extending.
     Known = Known.sext(BitWidth);
     break;
+  }
   case RISCVISD::SRAW: {
     KnownBits Known2;
     Known = DAG.computeKnownBits(Op.getOperand(0), DemandedElts, Depth + 1);



More information about the llvm-commits mailing list