[llvm] [LAA] Always use DepCands when grouping runtime checks. (PR #91196)

Mircea Trofin via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Aug 21 21:11:47 PDT 2025


mtrofin wrote:

> Hey, we're noticing this test showing that profile metadata is dropped in the pass (see https://lab.llvm.org/staging/#/builders/221/builds/164). It'd be awesome if you could look into that, but if not, could you add the test to this list (allowed fails): llvm/utils/profcheck-xfail.txt.
> 
> (We haven't yet gotten to the loop vectorizer tests, in fairness, so not totally surprising a new test there would fail. Mostly looking to see if someone with expertise there might help fix some profile propagation issues :)
> 
> More context: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-profile-information-propagation-unittesting/73595/11)
> 
> Thanks!



> Hey, we're noticing this test showing that profile metadata is dropped in the pass (see https://lab.llvm.org/staging/#/builders/221/builds/164). It'd be awesome if you could look into that, but if not, could you add the test to this list (allowed fails): llvm/utils/profcheck-xfail.txt.
> 
> (We haven't yet gotten to the loop vectorizer tests, in fairness, so not totally surprising a new test there would fail. Mostly looking to see if someone with expertise there might help fix some profile propagation issues :)
> 
> More context: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-profile-information-propagation-unittesting/73595/11)
> 
> Thanks!

Sorry for some confusion - this is due to ba5d487 which references this PR.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91196


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list