[llvm] [LV] Add initial legality checks for ee loops with stores (PR #145663)

Florian Hahn via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Aug 18 03:26:39 PDT 2025


================
@@ -1781,6 +1803,109 @@ bool LoopVectorizationLegality::isVectorizableEarlyExitLoop() {
                        "backedge taken count: "
                     << *SymbolicMaxBTC << '\n');
   UncountableExitingBB = SingleUncountableExitingBlock;
+  UncountedExitWithSideEffects = HasSideEffects;
+  return true;
+}
+
+bool LoopVectorizationLegality::canUncountedExitConditionLoadBeMoved(
+    BasicBlock *ExitingBlock) {
+  SmallVector<const SCEVPredicate *, 4> Predicates;
+  LoadInst *CriticalUncountedExitConditionLoad = nullptr;
+
+  // Try to find a load in the critical path for the uncounted exit condition.
+  // This is currently matching about the simplest form we can, expecting
+  // only one in-loop load, the result of which is directly compared against
+  // a loop-invariant value.
+  // FIXME: We're insisting on a single use for now, because otherwise we will
+  // need to make PHI nodes for other users. That can be done once the initial
+  // transform code lands.
+  auto *Br = cast<BranchInst>(ExitingBlock->getTerminator());
+
+  // FIXME: Don't rely on operand ordering for the comparison.
+  ICmpInst *Cmp = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(Br->getCondition());
+  if (Cmp && Cmp->hasOneUse() && TheLoop->isLoopInvariant(Cmp->getOperand(1))) {
----------------
fhahn wrote:

Simpler to use IR pattern matching here?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145663


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list