[llvm] [DependenceAnalysis] Extending SIV to handle fusable loops (PR #128782)

[via llvm-commits]

amehsan wrote:


> I don't think so. For example, regarding LoopInterchange, the following case isn't currently supported, but I believe it could be extended relatively easily

You are right. I was thinking about innermost loop transformations. I agree we need to add the flag that was discussed. (or otherwise address your question)

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128782