[llvm] [VPlan] Materialize VF and VFxUF using VPInstructions. (PR #152879)
Florian Hahn via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Aug 11 04:06:27 PDT 2025
================
@@ -3340,6 +3340,33 @@ void VPlanTransforms::materializeVectorTripCount(VPlan &Plan,
VectorTC.replaceAllUsesWith(Res);
}
+void VPlanTransforms::materializeVFAndVFxUF(VPlan &Plan, VPBasicBlock *VectorPH,
+ ElementCount VFEC) {
+ VPBuilder Builder(VectorPH, VectorPH->begin());
+ auto *TCTy = VPTypeAnalysis(Plan).inferScalarType(Plan.getTripCount());
+ VPValue &VF = Plan.getVF();
+ VPValue &VFxUF = Plan.getVFxUF();
+ if (VF.getNumUsers()) {
+ VPValue *RuntimeVF = Builder.createElementCount(TCTy, VFEC);
+ if (any_of(VF.users(), [&VF](VPUser *U) { return !U->usesScalars(&VF); })) {
+ auto *BC = Builder.createNaryOp(VPInstruction::Broadcast, {RuntimeVF});
+ VF.replaceUsesWithIf(
+ BC, [&VF](VPUser &U, unsigned) { return !U.usesScalars(&VF); });
+ }
+ VF.replaceAllUsesWith(RuntimeVF);
+
+ VPValue *UF = Plan.getOrAddLiveIn(ConstantInt::get(TCTy, Plan.getUF()));
+ auto *MulByUF = Plan.getUF() == 1 ? RuntimeVF
+ : Builder.createNaryOp(Instruction::Mul,
+ {RuntimeVF, UF});
----------------
fhahn wrote:
I'd prefer to not change this here. Until clarfiying LangRef to limit the maximal possible value of VScale (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144607), adding NUW here would be on shaky grounds IMO.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152879
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list