[llvm] [SimplifyCFG] Relax `cttz` cost check in `simplifySwitchOfPowersOfTwo` (PR #145159)
Yingwei Zheng via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun Jun 22 23:08:43 PDT 2025
================
@@ -7211,17 +7213,15 @@ static bool simplifySwitchOfPowersOfTwo(SwitchInst *SI, IRBuilder<> &Builder,
!DL.fitsInLegalInteger(CondTy->getIntegerBitWidth()))
return false;
- const auto CttzIntrinsicCost = TTI.getIntrinsicInstrCost(
- IntrinsicCostAttributes(Intrinsic::cttz, CondTy,
- {Condition, ConstantInt::getTrue(Context)}),
- TTI::TCK_SizeAndLatency);
-
- if (CttzIntrinsicCost > TTI::TCC_Basic)
- // Inserting intrinsic is too expensive.
+ // Ensure trailing zeroes count intrinsic emission is not too expensive.
+ IntrinsicCostAttributes Attrs(Intrinsic::cttz, CondTy,
+ {Condition, ConstantInt::getTrue(Context)});
+ if (TTI.getIntrinsicInstrCost(Attrs, TTI::TCK_SizeAndLatency) >
+ TTI::TCC_Basic * 2)
----------------
dtcxzyw wrote:
> Is there not a cost for the alternative codegen to compare against?
Without this transform, the switch will be lowered into an icmp chain/indirect jump table. Thus, the transform is always profitable if `ctlz` is natively supported. The default cost for native `ctlz` is `TCC_Basic`. Can we increase the threshold to `< TCC_Expensive` as it is also used in other places?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145159
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list