[llvm] [X86] Combine `store + vselect` to `masked_store` (PR #145176)

[Abhishek Kaushik via llvm-commits]

abhishek-kaushik22 wrote:

> > > Can we use a pattern match instead?
> > 
> > 
> > There was no `m_Load` to match the Load, so I've added one.
> 
> I mean add
> 
> ```
> def: Pat<(st_frag (_.VT (vselect_mask _.KRCWM:$mask, (_.VT _.RC:$src), (_.VT (ld_frag addr:$dst)))), addr:$dst), (!cast<Instruction>(Name#_.ZSuffix#mrk) addr:$ptr, _.KRCWM:$mask, _.RC:$src)>;
> def: Pat<(st_frag (_.VT (vselect_mask _.KRCWM:$mask, (_.VT _.RC:$src), _.ImmAllZerosV)), addr:$dst), (!cast<Instruction>(Name#_.ZSuffix#mrkz) addr:$ptr, _.KRCWM:$mask, _.RC:$src)>;
> ```
> 
> to avx512_store.

Is that safe to do? There might be other stores in between the store and load, and we don't have any alias information

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145176