[llvm] [WebAssembly] Fix missed optimization in 50142 (PR #144741)
Luke Lau via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jun 20 04:59:04 PDT 2025
================
@@ -3239,6 +3239,42 @@ static SDValue performBitcastCombine(SDNode *N,
return SDValue();
}
+static SDValue performAnyTrueCombine(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG) {
+ // any_true (setcc <X>, 0, eq)
+ // => not (all_true X)
+
+ SDLoc DL(N);
+ assert(N->getOpcode() == ISD::INTRINSIC_WO_CHAIN);
+ if (N->getConstantOperandVal(0) != Intrinsic::wasm_anytrue)
+ return SDValue();
+
+ SDValue SetCC = N->getOperand(1);
+ if (SetCC.getOpcode() != ISD::SETCC)
+ return SDValue();
+
+ SDValue LHS = SetCC->getOperand(0);
+ SDValue RHS = SetCC->getOperand(1);
+ ISD::CondCode Cond = cast<CondCodeSDNode>(SetCC->getOperand(2))->get();
+ EVT LT = LHS.getValueType();
+ unsigned NumElts = LT.getVectorNumElements();
+ if (NumElts != 2 && NumElts != 4 && NumElts != 8 && NumElts != 16)
+ return SDValue();
----------------
lukel97 wrote:
If we're matching on an any_true intrinsic does the number of elements not always have to be 2/4/8/16 to begin with? Can we get away with removing this check?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144741
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list