[llvm] [BOLT] Ensure remember and restore CFIs are in the same list (PR #144348)
via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jun 16 06:16:38 PDT 2025
llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->
@llvm/pr-subscribers-bolt
Author: Ash Dobrescu (Rin18)
<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>
In `addCFIInstruction`, we split the CFI information between `CFIInstrMapType CIEFrameInstructions` and `CFIInstrMapType FrameInstructions`. In some cases we can end up with the remember CFI in `CIEFrameInstructions` and the restore CFI in `FrameInstructions`. This patch adds a check to make sure we do not split remember and restore states and fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/133501.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144348.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) bolt/include/bolt/Core/BinaryFunction.h (+1-1)
``````````diff
diff --git a/bolt/include/bolt/Core/BinaryFunction.h b/bolt/include/bolt/Core/BinaryFunction.h
index ca8b786f4ab69..828c56d818b09 100644
--- a/bolt/include/bolt/Core/BinaryFunction.h
+++ b/bolt/include/bolt/Core/BinaryFunction.h
@@ -1663,7 +1663,7 @@ class BinaryFunction {
Offset = I->first;
}
assert(I->first == Offset && "CFI pointing to unknown instruction");
- if (I == Instructions.begin()) {
+ if (I == Instructions.begin() && Inst.getOperation() != MCCFIInstruction::OpRememberState) {
CIEFrameInstructions.emplace_back(std::forward<MCCFIInstruction>(Inst));
return;
}
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144348
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list