[llvm] [CodeGen][MachineLoop] Fix getLoopID (PR #137820)
Matt Arsenault via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu May 22 01:35:01 PDT 2025
================
@@ -181,48 +181,32 @@ MachineLoopInfo::findLoopPreheader(MachineLoop *L, bool SpeculativePreheader,
MDNode *MachineLoop::getLoopID() const {
MDNode *LoopID = nullptr;
- if (const auto *MBB = findLoopControlBlock()) {
- // If there is a single latch block, then the metadata
- // node is attached to its terminating instruction.
+
+ // Go through the latch blocks and check the terminator for the metadata
+ SmallVector<MachineBasicBlock *, 4> LatchesBlocks;
+ getLoopLatches(LatchesBlocks);
+ for (const auto *MBB : LatchesBlocks) {
const auto *BB = MBB->getBasicBlock();
if (!BB)
return nullptr;
- if (const auto *TI = BB->getTerminator())
- LoopID = TI->getMetadata(LLVMContext::MD_loop);
- } else if (const auto *MBB = getHeader()) {
- // There seem to be multiple latch blocks, so we have to
- // visit all predecessors of the loop header and check
- // their terminating instructions for the metadata.
- if (const auto *Header = MBB->getBasicBlock()) {
- // Walk over all blocks in the loop.
- for (const auto *MBB : this->blocks()) {
- const auto *BB = MBB->getBasicBlock();
- if (!BB)
- return nullptr;
- const auto *TI = BB->getTerminator();
- if (!TI)
- return nullptr;
- MDNode *MD = nullptr;
- // Check if this terminating instruction jumps to the loop header.
- for (const auto *Succ : successors(TI)) {
- if (Succ == Header) {
- // This is a jump to the header - gather the metadata from it.
- MD = TI->getMetadata(LLVMContext::MD_loop);
- break;
- }
- }
- if (!MD)
- continue;
- if (!LoopID)
- LoopID = MD;
- else if (MD != LoopID)
- return nullptr;
- }
- }
+ const auto *TI = BB->getTerminator();
+ if (!TI)
+ return nullptr;
+ MDNode *MD = TI->getMetadata(LLVMContext::MD_loop);
+
+ if (!MD)
+ return nullptr;
+
+ if (!LoopID)
+ LoopID = MD;
+ else if (MD != LoopID)
+ return nullptr;
}
- if (LoopID &&
- (LoopID->getNumOperands() == 0 || LoopID->getOperand(0) != LoopID))
- LoopID = nullptr;
+
+ if (!LoopID || LoopID->getNumOperands() == 0 ||
----------------
arsenm wrote:
Is the getNumOperands() == 0 check really necessary? I would hope the verifier rejects cases with missing operands (but you are just moving existing code)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137820
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list