[llvm] [LAA] Improve code in replaceSymbolicStrideSCEV (NFC) (PR #139532)

[via llvm-commits]

llvmbot wrote:


<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->

@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-analysis

Author: Ramkumar Ramachandra (artagnon)

<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>

Prefer DenseMap::lookup over DenseMap::find.

---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139532.diff


1 Files Affected:

- (modified) llvm/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp (+2-3) 


``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp
index 438669df51f89..f4e1d632b4d7d 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp
@@ -158,12 +158,11 @@ const SCEV *llvm::replaceSymbolicStrideSCEV(PredicatedScalarEvolution &PSE,
 
   // If there is an entry in the map return the SCEV of the pointer with the
   // symbolic stride replaced by one.
-  DenseMap<Value *, const SCEV *>::const_iterator SI = PtrToStride.find(Ptr);
-  if (SI == PtrToStride.end())
+  const SCEV *StrideSCEV = PtrToStride.lookup(Ptr);
+  if (!StrideSCEV)
     // For a non-symbolic stride, just return the original expression.
     return OrigSCEV;
 
-  const SCEV *StrideSCEV = SI->second;
   // Note: This assert is both overly strong and overly weak.  The actual
   // invariant here is that StrideSCEV should be loop invariant.  The only
   // such invariant strides we happen to speculate right now are unknowns

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139532