[llvm] [JITLink][i386] Avoid 'i386' name clashing with built-in macro (PR #137063)

[Lang Hames via llvm-commits]

lhames wrote:

I’d be fine renaming this backed to `x86` (or `x86_32`) to avoid the clash. I doubt that there are any explicit references to `jitlink::i386` outside llvm-project so I’d expect the fallout to be minimal (beyond a bunch of renames in LLVM itself).

I’m travelling with limited internet access for the next week and a bit, but can check in on this when I get back to my desk.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137063