[llvm] Refactored llvm::UpgradeIntrinsicCall() function in lib/IR/AutoUpgrade.cpp with lookup table based on #30382 (PR #128611)
via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Feb 24 16:54:21 PST 2025
github-actions[bot] wrote:
<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:
<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>
``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff 49c31201278ae5949694ed78b69ffbbca6a1826a c7477ed69b74dd1212697d9414b6de4846a1ea4d --extensions cpp -- llvm/lib/IR/AutoUpgrade.cpp
``````````
</details>
<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>
``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/IR/AutoUpgrade.cpp b/llvm/lib/IR/AutoUpgrade.cpp
index 06db5c024f..0304f644c2 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/IR/AutoUpgrade.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/IR/AutoUpgrade.cpp
@@ -4375,13 +4375,13 @@ void llvm::UpgradeIntrinsicCall(CallBase *CI, Function *NewFn) {
not_consumed = false;
if (entry.first == prefix_x86 || Name != "stackprotectorcheck") {
if (entry.first == prefix_dbg) {
- // We might have decided we don't want the new format after all between
- // first requesting the upgrade and now; skip the conversion if that is
- // the case, and check here to see if the intrinsic needs to be upgraded
- // normally.
+ // We might have decided we don't want the new format after all
+ // between first requesting the upgrade and now; skip the conversion
+ // if that is the case, and check here to see if the intrinsic needs
+ // to be upgraded normally.
if (!CI->getModule()->IsNewDbgInfoFormat) {
- bool NeedsUpgrade =
- upgradeIntrinsicFunction1(CI->getCalledFunction(), NewFn, false);
+ bool NeedsUpgrade = upgradeIntrinsicFunction1(
+ CI->getCalledFunction(), NewFn, false);
if (!NeedsUpgrade)
return;
FallthroughToDefaultUpgrade = true;
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128611
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list