[llvm] [llvm] DLLExport public methods from SmallVector (PR #127850)

[Vassil Vassilev via llvm-commits]

vgvassilev wrote:

> > The scope of the changes seems very broad to me, perhaps it would be worth reviving the discourse thread and making sure this is the direction we want to pursue?
> 
> Agreed, that the change is going to be very large in total, but scoping it to per-library is a reasonable approach IMO.
> 
> > Similarly, do we have a policy in place that will make us apply these macros in the future code?
> 
> Yes, @vgvassilev has a colleague who is looking into setting up [ids](https://github.com/compnerd/ids) to help catch missing annotations. I don't have the link for that conversation off hand unfortunately.

cc-ing @mcbarton here as he reported some progress in private...

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127850