[llvm] [RISCV] Add DAG combine for forming VAADDU_VL from VP intrinsics. (PR #124848)
Philip Reames via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jan 29 09:01:03 PST 2025
================
@@ -16373,6 +16371,101 @@ static SDValue performVP_STORECombine(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
VPStore->isTruncatingStore(), VPStore->isCompressingStore());
}
+// Peephole avgceil pattern.
+// %1 = zext <N x i8> %a to <N x i32>
+// %2 = zext <N x i8> %b to <N x i32>
+// %3 = add nuw nsw <N x i32> %1, splat (i32 1)
+// %4 = add nuw nsw <N x i32> %3, %2
+// %5 = lshr <N x i32> %N, <i32 1 x N>
+// %6 = trunc <N x i32> %5 to <N x i8>
+static SDValue performVP_TRUNCATECombine(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
+ const RISCVSubtarget &Subtarget) {
+ EVT VT = N->getValueType(0);
+
+ // Ignore fixed vectors.
+ const TargetLowering &TLI = DAG.getTargetLoweringInfo();
+ if (!VT.isScalableVector() || !TLI.isTypeLegal(VT))
+ return SDValue();
+
+ SDValue In = N->getOperand(0);
+ SDValue Mask = N->getOperand(1);
+ SDValue VL = N->getOperand(2);
+
+ // Input should be a vp_srl with same mask and VL.
+ if (In.getOpcode() != ISD::VP_SRL || In.getOperand(2) != Mask ||
+ In.getOperand(3) != VL)
+ return SDValue();
+
+ // Shift amount should be 1.
+ if (!isOneOrOneSplat(In.getOperand(1)))
+ return SDValue();
+
+ // Shifted value should be a vp_add with same mask and VL.
+ SDValue LHS = In.getOperand(0);
+ if (LHS.getOpcode() != ISD::VP_ADD || LHS.getOperand(2) != Mask ||
+ LHS.getOperand(3) != VL)
+ return SDValue();
+
+ SDValue Operands[3];
+ Operands[0] = LHS.getOperand(0);
+ Operands[1] = LHS.getOperand(1);
+
+ // Matches another VP_ADD with same VL and Mask.
+ auto FindAdd = [&](SDValue V, SDValue &Op0, SDValue &Op1) {
+ if (V.getOpcode() != ISD::VP_ADD || V.getOperand(2) != Mask ||
+ V.getOperand(3) != VL)
+ return false;
+
+ Op0 = V.getOperand(0);
+ Op1 = V.getOperand(1);
+ return true;
+ };
+
+ // We need to find another VP_ADD in one of the operands.
+ SDValue Op0, Op1;
+ if (FindAdd(Operands[0], Op0, Op1))
----------------
preames wrote:
The multiple uses of Operands[0] seems a tad confusing to me. The logic appears correct, but might it be simpler to simply pass LHS.getOperand(X) to the helper, and update Operands[1], and Operands[2] by reference?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124848
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list