[llvm] [AArch64][CodeGen] Optimize security cookie check with New Fixup Pass (PR #121938)

[Matt Arsenault via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -0,0 +1,275 @@
+//===- AArch64WinFixupBufferSecurityCheck.cpp Fix Buffer Security Check Call
+//-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+// Buffer Security Check implementation inserts windows specific callback into
+// code. On windows, __security_check_cookie call gets call everytime function
+// is return without fixup. Since this function is defined in runtime library,
+// it incures cost of call in dll which simply does comparison and returns most
+// time. With Fixup, We selective move to call in DLL only if comparison fails.
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "llvm/CodeGen/LivePhysRegs.h"
+#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineFunctionPass.h"
+#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineInstrBuilder.h"
+#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineRegisterInfo.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/Module.h"
+
+#include "AArch64.h"
+#include "AArch64InstrInfo.h"
+#include "AArch64Subtarget.h"
+
+using namespace llvm;
+
+#define DEBUG_TYPE "aarch64-win-fixup-bscheck"
+
+namespace {
+
+class AArch64WinFixupBufferSecurityCheckPass : public MachineFunctionPass {
+public:
+  static char ID;
+
+  AArch64WinFixupBufferSecurityCheckPass() : MachineFunctionPass(ID) {}
+
+  StringRef getPassName() const override {
+    return "AArch64 Windows Fixup Buffer Security Check";
+  }
+
+  bool runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) override;
+
+  std::pair<MachineBasicBlock *, MachineInstr *>
+  getSecurityCheckerBasicBlock(MachineFunction &MF);
+
+  MachineInstr *cloneLoadStackGuard(MachineBasicBlock *CurMBB,
+                                    MachineInstr *CheckCall);
+
+  void getGuardCheckSequence(MachineBasicBlock *CurMBB, MachineInstr *CheckCall,
+                             MachineInstr *SeqMI[5]);
+
+  void SplitBasicBlock(MachineBasicBlock *CurMBB, MachineBasicBlock *NewRetMBB,
+                       MachineBasicBlock::iterator SplitIt);
+
+  void FinishBlock(MachineBasicBlock *MBB);
+
+  void FinishFunction(MachineBasicBlock *FailMBB, MachineBasicBlock *NewRetMBB);
+};
+} // end anonymous namespace
+
+char AArch64WinFixupBufferSecurityCheckPass::ID = 0;
+
+INITIALIZE_PASS(AArch64WinFixupBufferSecurityCheckPass, DEBUG_TYPE, DEBUG_TYPE,
+                false, false)
+
+FunctionPass *llvm::createAArch64WinFixupBufferSecurityCheckPass() {
+  return new AArch64WinFixupBufferSecurityCheckPass();
+}
+
+void AArch64WinFixupBufferSecurityCheckPass::SplitBasicBlock(
+    MachineBasicBlock *CurMBB, MachineBasicBlock *NewRetMBB,
+    MachineBasicBlock::iterator SplitIt) {
+  NewRetMBB->splice(NewRetMBB->end(), CurMBB, SplitIt, CurMBB->end());
+}
+
+std::pair<MachineBasicBlock *, MachineInstr *>
+AArch64WinFixupBufferSecurityCheckPass::getSecurityCheckerBasicBlock(
+    MachineFunction &MF) {
+  for (auto &MBB : MF) {
+    for (auto &MI : MBB) {
+      if (MI.getOpcode() == AArch64::BL && MI.getNumExplicitOperands() == 1) {
----------------
arsenm wrote:

Maybe check MI.isCall instead? 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121938