[llvm] Add SD matchers and unit test coverage for ISD::VECTOR_SHUFFLE (PR #119592)

Min-Yih Hsu via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sat Dec 14 16:00:52 PST 2024


================
@@ -540,6 +540,45 @@ struct BinaryOpc_match {
   }
 };
 
+/// Matching while capturing mask
+template <typename T0, typename T1> struct SDShuffle_match {
+  T0 Op1;
+  T1 Op2;
+
+  const ArrayRef<int> *MaskRef;
+
+  // capturing mask
+  SDShuffle_match(const T0 &Op1, const T1 &Op2, const ArrayRef<int> &MaskRef)
+      : Op1(Op1), Op2(Op2), MaskRef(&MaskRef) {}
+
+  template <typename MatchContext>
+  bool match(const MatchContext &Ctx, SDValue N) {
+    if (auto *I = dyn_cast<ShuffleVectorSDNode>(N)) {
+      return Op1.match(Ctx, I->getOperand(0)) &&
+             Op2.match(Ctx, I->getOperand(1));
+    }
+    return false;
+  }
+};
+
+/// Matching against a specific match
+template <typename T0, typename T1> struct SDShuffle_maskMatch {
+  T0 Op1;
+  T1 Op2;
+  ArrayRef<int> SpecificMask;
+
+  SDShuffle_maskMatch(const T0 &Op1, const T1 &Op2, const ArrayRef<int> Mask)
+      : Op1(Op1), Op2(Op2), SpecificMask(Mask) {}
+
+  template <typename MatchContext>
+  bool match(const MatchContext &Ctx, SDValue N) {
+    if (auto *I = dyn_cast<ShuffleVectorSDNode>(N)) {
+      return Op1.match(Ctx, I->getOperand(0)) &&
+             Op2.match(Ctx, I->getOperand(1)) && I->getMask() == SpecificMask;
----------------
mshockwave wrote:

> I->getMask() == SpecificMask

I don't think this is the right way to compare mask. As I mentioned before, `ArrayRef` should be treated as a pointer. So what you do here is essentially comparing two pointers, which is wrong. You probably want to do element-wise comparison.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119592


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list