[llvm] [AMDGPU] Handle hazard in v_scalef32_sr_fp4_* conversions (PR #118589)

[Pravin Jagtap via llvm-commits]

pravinjagtap wrote:

> > Ping @arsenm.
> 
> This is fine but I would prefer that we have one searchable table instead of 2, as mentioned above. Can do as a follow up

We have only one searchable table `FP4FP8DstByteSelTable` now after this patch. Which other you are referring to? 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118589