[llvm] [llvm]Add a simple Telemetry framework (PR #102323)
James Henderson via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Oct 18 08:13:08 PDT 2024
================
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+//===- llvm/Telemetry/Telemetry.h - Telemetry -------------------*- C++ -*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+///
+/// \file
+/// This file provides the basic framework for Telemetry
+///
+/// It comprises of three important structs/classes:
+///
+/// - Telemeter: The class responsible for collecting and forwarding
+/// telemery data.
+/// - TelemetryInfo: data courier
+/// - TelemetryConfig: this stores configurations on Telemeter.
+///
+/// Refer to its documentation at llvm/docs/Telemetry.rst for more details.
+//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#ifndef LLVM_TELEMETRY_TELEMETRY_H
+#define LLVM_TELEMETRY_TELEMETRY_H
+
+#include <chrono>
+#include <ctime>
+#include <memory>
+#include <optional>
+#include <string>
+
+#include "llvm/ADT/StringExtras.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/StringRef.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/Error.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/JSON.h"
+
+namespace llvm {
+namespace telemetry {
+
+/// Configuration for the Telemeter class.
+/// This stores configurations from both users and vendors and is passed
+/// to the Telemeter upon construction. (Any changes to the config after
+/// the Telemeter's construction will not have effect on it).
+///
+/// This struct can be extended as needed to add additional configuration
+/// points specific to a vendor's implementation.
+struct Config {
+ // If true, telemetry will be enabled.
+ bool EnableTelemetry;
+
+ // Implementation-defined names of additional destinations to send
+ // telemetry data (Could be stdout, stderr, or some local paths, etc).
+ //
+ // These strings will be interpreted by the vendor's code.
+ // So the users must pick the from their vendor's pre-defined
+ // set of Destinations.
+ std::vector<std::string> AdditionalDestinations;
+};
+
+/// For isa, dyn_cast, etc operations on TelemetryInfo.
+typedef unsigned KindType;
+/// This struct is used by TelemetryInfo to support isa<>, dyn_cast<>
+/// operations.
+/// It is defined as a struct (rather than an enum) because it is
+/// expectend to be extended by subclasses which may have
+/// additional TelemetryInfo types defined to describe different events.
+struct EntryKind {
+ static const KindType Base = 0;
+};
+
+/// TelemetryInfo is the data courier, used to move instrumented data
+/// from the tool being monitored to the Telemery framework.
+///
+/// This base class contains only the basic set of telemetry data.
+/// Downstream implementations can add more fields as needed to describe
+/// additional events.
+///
+/// For example, The LLDB debugger can define a DebugCommandInfo subclass
+/// which has additional fields about the debug-command being instrumented,
+/// such as `CommandArguments` or `CommandName`.
+struct TelemetryInfo {
+ // This represents a unique-id, conventionally corresponding to
+ // a tool's session - i.e., every time the tool starts until it exits.
+ //
+ // Note: a tool could have multiple sessions running at once, in which
+ // case, these shall be multiple sets of TelemetryInfo with multiple unique
+ // ids.
+ //
+ // Different usages can assign different types of IDs to this field.
+ std::string SessionId;
+
+ TelemetryInfo() = default;
+ virtual ~TelemetryInfo() = default;
+
+ virtual json::Object serializeToJson() const;
----------------
jh7370 wrote:
This function still feels wrong to me. I reckon it should look like this:
```
virtual void serialize(Serializer &serializer) const = 0;
```
Concrete implementations populate it with functions like this:
```
void serialize(Serializer &serializer) const override {
serializer.write("key1", value);
serializer.write("key2", value2);
}
```
The `Serializer` class is then an abstract class, with concrete implementations defined in partnership with the `Destination` classes. For example, you'd have a `JsonSerializer` that knows how to record key/value pairs as Json, and then `Destination` classes could be `StdoutDestination` or `FileDestination`. Since Json is likely to be a popular choice, we might want to have `JsonSerializer` defined upstream. We could have `StdoutDestination` and/or `FileDestination` upstream too (or more generically `StreamDestination`). By restricting the destination enabling to vendor-side code, there's no security risk here, because the vendor can simply not provide the hooks to configure these destinations.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102323
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list