[llvm] [Scalarizer][DirectX] support structs return types (PR #111569)

[Farzon Lotfi via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+; RUN: opt -passes='function(scalarizer)' -S -mtriple=dxil-pc-shadermodel6.3-library %s | FileCheck %s
+
+define void @test_vector_double_split_void(<2 x double> noundef %d) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: define void @test_vector_double_split_void(
+; CHECK-SAME: <2 x double> noundef [[D:%.*]]) {
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[D_I0:%.*]] = extractelement <2 x double> [[D]], i64 0
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[HLSL_ASUINT_I0:%.*]] = call { i32, i32 } @llvm.dx.splitdouble.i32(double [[D_I0]])
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[D_I1:%.*]] = extractelement <2 x double> [[D]], i64 1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[HLSL_ASUINT_I1:%.*]] = call { i32, i32 } @llvm.dx.splitdouble.i32(double [[D_I1]])
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret void
+;
+  %hlsl.asuint = call { <2 x i32>, <2 x i32> }  @llvm.dx.splitdouble.v2i32(<2 x double> %d)
----------------
farzonl wrote:

This isn't the right place for this discussion. The team already went through revisions of what this intrinsic should look like on the split double PR https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109331. If you want an improvement It be best until after both these PRs merge.

Also overloads aren't really relevant for this intrinsic so lets not complicate the discussion.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111569