[llvm] [FuncSpec] Update MinFunctionSize logic (PR #112711)
via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Oct 17 06:59:13 PDT 2024
llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->
@llvm/pr-subscribers-function-specialization
Author: Hari Limaye (hazzlim)
<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>
Always require functions to be larger than MinFunctionSize when SpecializeLiteralConstant is enabled, and increase MinFunctionSize to 400, to prevent excessive triggering of specialisations on small functions.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112711.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/FunctionSpecialization.cpp (+10-5)
``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/FunctionSpecialization.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/FunctionSpecialization.cpp
index bd0a337e579e48..6d5c8b4229a417 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/FunctionSpecialization.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/FunctionSpecialization.cpp
@@ -57,9 +57,9 @@ static cl::opt<unsigned> MaxBlockPredecessors(
"considered during the estimation of dead code"));
static cl::opt<unsigned> MinFunctionSize(
- "funcspec-min-function-size", cl::init(300), cl::Hidden, cl::desc(
- "Don't specialize functions that have less than this number of "
- "instructions"));
+ "funcspec-min-function-size", cl::init(500), cl::Hidden,
+ cl::desc("Don't specialize functions that have less than this number of "
+ "instructions"));
static cl::opt<unsigned> MaxCodeSizeGrowth(
"funcspec-max-codesize-growth", cl::init(3), cl::Hidden, cl::desc(
@@ -641,12 +641,17 @@ bool FunctionSpecializer::run() {
Metrics.analyzeBasicBlock(&BB, GetTTI(F), EphValues);
}
+ // When specializing literal constants is enabled, always require functions
+ // to be larger than MinFunctionSize, to prevent excessive specialization.
+ bool RequireMinSize =
+ !ForceSpecialization &&
+ (SpecializeLiteralConstant || !F.hasFnAttribute(Attribute::NoInline));
+
// If the code metrics reveal that we shouldn't duplicate the function,
// or if the code size implies that this function is easy to get inlined,
// then we shouldn't specialize it.
if (Metrics.notDuplicatable || !Metrics.NumInsts.isValid() ||
- (!ForceSpecialization && !F.hasFnAttribute(Attribute::NoInline) &&
- Metrics.NumInsts < MinFunctionSize))
+ (RequireMinSize && Metrics.NumInsts < MinFunctionSize))
continue;
// TODO: For now only consider recursive functions when running multiple
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112711
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list