[llvm] LAA: be less conservative in isNoWrap (PR #112553)

[via llvm-commits]

github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->


:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff f113a66c29b17e4937ff5d0ab67dc087fa6ee27e fb91f31bb874ddfed9ddb040348bd5a9af4e1ea2 --extensions cpp -- llvm/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp
``````````

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp
index 9a7b8d2ac2..0d2ee6fb67 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp
@@ -825,8 +825,8 @@ static bool hasComputableBounds(PredicatedScalarEvolution &PSE, Value *Ptr,
 
 /// Check whether a pointer address cannot wrap.
 static bool isNoWrap(PredicatedScalarEvolution &PSE,
-                     const DenseMap<Value *, const SCEV *> &Strides, Value *Ptr, Type *AccessTy,
-                     Loop *L, bool Assume) {
+                     const DenseMap<Value *, const SCEV *> &Strides, Value *Ptr,
+                     Type *AccessTy, Loop *L, bool Assume) {
   const SCEV *PtrScev = PSE.getSCEV(Ptr);
   if (PSE.getSE()->isLoopInvariant(PtrScev, L))
     return true;

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112553