[compiler-rt] [rtsan] Introduce blocking-fn-name and intercepted-fn-name suppressions (PR #112108)

[via llvm-commits]

davidtrevelyan wrote:

> > Right, I meant more in the context of this CL though. If I add a list the ignore list, why do I care if it's blocking or intercepted?
> 
> Good question. @davidtrevelyan any thoughts? We could possibly change this to `function-name`, which would encapsulate both. I'm not opposed to this.

Agreed - I think a single `function-name` suppressor would suffice - nice suggestion! I spent a while trying to conceive of a counter example and nothing came to mind. 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112108