[llvm] Promote pseudo opcodes from 32-bit to 64-bit for instructions that infer extsw elimination in PPCMIPeepholes pass (PR #85451)

[Lei Huang via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -5234,6 +5234,244 @@ bool PPCInstrInfo::isTOCSaveMI(const MachineInstr &MI) const {
 // We limit the max depth to track incoming values of PHIs or binary ops
 // (e.g. AND) to avoid excessive cost.
 const unsigned MAX_BINOP_DEPTH = 1;
+
+// The `PromoteInstr32To64ForEmliEXTSW` function is recursive. The parameter
+// BinOpDepth  does not count all of the recursions. The parameter BinOpDepth is
+// incremented  only when `PromoteInstr32To64ForEmliEXTSW` calls itself more
+// than once. This is done to prevent exponential recursion. The function will
+// promote the instruction which defines the register `Reg` in the parameter
+// from a 32-bit to a 64-bit instruction if needed. Additionally, all the used
+// and defined registers in the instruction may also need to be promoted from
+// 32-bit to 64-bit based on the promoted instruction description. If a used
+// register is promoted to 64-bit, the instruction which defines the promoted
+// register also needs to be promoted. After an instruction is promoted to 64
+// bits, the defined register of the promoted instruction is also 64-bit. A
+// defined register may be used by other instructions; in such cases,
+//  we need to extract the 32-bit register used by other
+//  non-promoted 32-bit instructions from the promoted 64-bit register.
+void PPCInstrInfo::PromoteInstr32To64ForEmliEXTSW(const Register &Reg,
+                                                  MachineRegisterInfo *MRI,
+                                                  unsigned BinOpDepth,
+                                                  LiveVariables *LV) const {
+  MachineInstr *MI = MRI->getVRegDef(Reg);
+  if (!MI)
+    return;
+
+  unsigned Opcode = MI->getOpcode();
+  bool IsNonSignedExtInstrPromoted = false;
+  int NewOpcode = -1;
+
+  auto CheckAndSetNewOpcode = [&](int NewOpc) {
+    if (!IsNonSignedExtInstrPromoted) {
+      NewOpcode = NewOpc;
+      IsNonSignedExtInstrPromoted = true;
+    }
+  };
+
+  auto SetNewOpcode = [&](int NewOpc) {
+    NewOpcode = NewOpc;
+    IsNonSignedExtInstrPromoted = true;
+  };
+
+  switch (Opcode) {
----------------
lei137 wrote:

I'm not too familiar with those functions... is it possible to use those the check for conditions instead of explicitly stating these opcodes here?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85451