[llvm] [CodeGen] [AMDGPU] Attempt DAGCombine for fmul with select to ldexp (PR #111109)

[Matt Arsenault via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -14476,6 +14477,60 @@ SDValue SITargetLowering::performFDivCombine(SDNode *N,
   return SDValue();
 }
 
+SDValue SITargetLowering::performFMulCombine(SDNode *N,
+                                             DAGCombinerInfo &DCI) const {
+  SelectionDAG &DAG = DCI.DAG;
+  EVT VT = N->getValueType(0);
+  EVT i32VT = VT.changeElementType(MVT::i32);
+
+  SDLoc SL(N);
+  SDValue LHS = N->getOperand(0);
+  SDValue RHS = N->getOperand(1);
+
+  // ldexp(x, zext(i1 y)) -> fmul x, (select y, 2.0, 1.0)
+  // ldexp(x, sext(i1 y)) -> fmul x, (select y, 0.5, 1.0)
+  //
+  // The above mentioned ldexp folding works fine for
+  // bf16/f32, but as for f64 it creates f64 select which
+  // is costly to materialize as compared to f64 ldexp
+  // so here we undo the transform for f64 datatype.
+  // Also in case of f16, its cheaper to materialize inline
+  // 32 bit-constant (via ldexp use) rather than using fmul.
+  //
+  // Given : A = 2^a  &  B = 2^b ; where a and b are integers.
+  // fmul x, (select y, A, B)     -> ldexp( x, (select i32 y, a, b) )
+  // fmul x, (select y, -A, -B)   -> ldexp( (fneg x), (select i32 y, a, b) )
+  // Note : It takes care of generic scenario which covers undoing
+  // of special case(zext/sext) as mentioned.
----------------
arsenm wrote:

```suggestion
```

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111109