[llvm] [VPlan] Delay adding canonical IV increment and exit branches. (PR #82270)
via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun Sep 15 11:23:24 PDT 2024
================
@@ -1235,16 +1235,10 @@ void VPlanTransforms::optimize(VPlan &Plan, ScalarEvolution &SE) {
static VPActiveLaneMaskPHIRecipe *addVPLaneMaskPhiAndUpdateExitBranch(
VPlan &Plan, bool DataAndControlFlowWithoutRuntimeCheck) {
VPRegionBlock *TopRegion = Plan.getVectorLoopRegion();
- VPBasicBlock *EB = TopRegion->getExitingBasicBlock();
auto *CanonicalIVPHI = Plan.getCanonicalIV();
VPValue *StartV = CanonicalIVPHI->getStartValue();
- auto *CanonicalIVIncrement =
- cast<VPInstruction>(CanonicalIVPHI->getBackedgeValue());
- // TODO: Check if dropping the flags is needed if
- // !DataAndControlFlowWithoutRuntimeCheck.
- CanonicalIVIncrement->dropPoisonGeneratingFlags();
- DebugLoc DL = CanonicalIVIncrement->getDebugLoc();
+ DebugLoc DL = CanonicalIVPHI->getDebugLoc();
----------------
ayalz wrote:
This is for an increment placed in the preheader, so ok to use the DL of the phi instead of that of the in-loop/backedged-value increment?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82270
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list