[llvm] [LoopVectorize] Teach LoopVectorizationLegality about more early exits (PR #107004)
David Sherwood via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Sep 10 02:04:56 PDT 2024
================
@@ -2445,8 +2445,11 @@ bool LoopAccessInfo::analyzeLoop(AAResults *AA, const LoopInfo *LI,
// vectorize a loop if it contains known function calls that don't set
// the flag. Therefore, it is safe to ignore this read from memory.
auto *Call = dyn_cast<CallInst>(&I);
- if (Call && getVectorIntrinsicIDForCall(Call, TLI))
- continue;
+ if (Call) {
+ NumCalls++;
----------------
david-arm wrote:
I've reverted this code in favour of calling `isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute` from LoopVectorizationLegality. This covers more cases such as divides, while at the same time permitting calls to intrinsics such as sqrt.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107004
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list