[llvm] [RFC] IR: Define noalias.addrspace metadata (PR #102461)
via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Sep 9 03:56:40 PDT 2024
================
@@ -8021,6 +8021,43 @@ it will contain a list of ids, including the ids of the callsites in the
full inline sequence, in order from the leaf-most call's id to the outermost
inlined call.
+
+'``noalias.addrspace``' Metadata
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+The ``noalias.addrspace`` metadata is used to identify memory
+operations which cannot access a range of address spaces. It is
+attached to memory instructions, including :ref:`atomicrmw
+<i_atomicrmw>`, :ref:`cmpxchg <i_cmpxchg>`, and :ref:`call <i_call>`
+instructions.
+
+This follows the same form as :ref:`range metadata <range-metadata>`,
+except the field entries must be of type `i32`. The interpretation is
+the same numeric address spaces as applied to IR values.
+
+Example:
+
+.. code-block:: llvm
+
+ ; %ptr cannot point to an object allocated in addrspace(5)
+ %rmw.valid = atomicrmw and ptr %ptr, i64 %value seq_cst, !noalias.addrspace !0
+
+ ; Undefined behavior. The underlying object is allocated in one of the listed
+ ; address spaces.
+ %alloca = alloca i64, addrspace(5)
+ %alloca.cast = addrspacecast ptr addrspace(5) %alloca to ptr
+ %rmw.ub = atomicrmw and ptr %alloca.cast, i64 %value seq_cst, !noalias.addrspace !0
+
+ !0 = !{i32 5, i32 6}
----------------
gonzalobg wrote:
Thanks for the clarification.
FWIW I think that encoding this as a range instead of a list is fine.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102461
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list