[llvm] [ArgPromotion] Perform alias analysis on actual arguments of Calls (PR #106216)

[via llvm-commits]

github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->


:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff 2e9b3316ee8b4339e2f023173db780ea09c44a88 6b9b01890f86389212cbe762e43bf896215dd9dd --extensions cpp -- llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/ArgumentPromotion.cpp
``````````

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/ArgumentPromotion.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/ArgumentPromotion.cpp
index d3690ada28..aaa9792c00 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/ArgumentPromotion.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/ArgumentPromotion.cpp
@@ -746,7 +746,6 @@ static bool findArgParts(Argument *Arg, const DataLayout &DL, AAResults &AAR,
   // Okay, now we know that the argument is only used by load instructions, and
   // it is safe to unconditionally perform all of them.
 
-
   // If we can determine that no call to the Function modifies the memory region
   // accessed through Arg, through alias analysis using actual arguments in the
   // callers, we know that it is guaranteed to be safe to promote the argument.

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106216