[llvm] LICM: hoist BO assoc when BinOp is in RHS (PR #107072)

[via llvm-commits]

github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->


:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff 55a24738302eb9bb5bf458220deb20ddef60ce51 d7f2c17251755fbb306505077f18925fa20cb6c5 --extensions cpp -- llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LICM.cpp
``````````

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LICM.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LICM.cpp
index f10dbcf5f8..ecb65be160 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LICM.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LICM.cpp
@@ -2840,7 +2840,7 @@ static bool hoistBOAssociation(Instruction &I, Loop &L,
       assert(BO0->isCommutative() && "Associativity implies commutativity");
   } else if (L.isLoopInvariant(LV) && !L.isLoopInvariant(C1)) {
     if (!BinOpInRHS)
-       assert(BO0->isCommutative() && "Associativity implies commutativity");
+      assert(BO0->isCommutative() && "Associativity implies commutativity");
     std::swap(LV, C1);
   } else {
     return false;
@@ -2859,9 +2859,9 @@ static bool hoistBOAssociation(Instruction &I, Loop &L,
   auto *NewBO =
       BinOpInRHS
           ? BinaryOperator::Create(Opcode, Inv, LV, BO->getName() + ".reass",
-                                    BO->getIterator())
+                                   BO->getIterator())
           : BinaryOperator::Create(Opcode, LV, Inv, BO->getName() + ".reass",
-                                    BO->getIterator());
+                                   BO->getIterator());
 
   // Copy NUW for ADDs if both instructions have it.
   if (Opcode == Instruction::Add && BO->hasNoUnsignedWrap() &&

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107072