[llvm] [BOLT][NFC] Don't remove nops in non-simple functions (PR #101964)
via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Aug 5 05:02:24 PDT 2024
llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->
@llvm/pr-subscribers-bolt
Author: Vladislav Khmelevsky (yota9)
<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>
Follow the logic of https://reviews.llvm.org/D143887 patch (fixed later
by #<!-- -->71377) we don't want to remove nops in non-simple function just in
case there is undetected jump table to minimize chances to break offsets
in it.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101964.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) bolt/lib/Passes/BinaryPasses.cpp (+1-1)
``````````diff
diff --git a/bolt/lib/Passes/BinaryPasses.cpp b/bolt/lib/Passes/BinaryPasses.cpp
index fa95ad7324ac1..fbbbe1e05df2c 100644
--- a/bolt/lib/Passes/BinaryPasses.cpp
+++ b/bolt/lib/Passes/BinaryPasses.cpp
@@ -1923,7 +1923,7 @@ Error RemoveNops::runOnFunctions(BinaryContext &BC) {
};
ParallelUtilities::PredicateTy SkipFunc = [&](const BinaryFunction &BF) {
- return BF.shouldPreserveNops();
+ return BF.shouldPreserveNops() || (!opts::StrictMode && !BF.isSimple());
};
ParallelUtilities::runOnEachFunction(
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101964
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list