[llvm] [BOLT][NFC] Don't remove nops in non-simple functions (PR #101964)
Vladislav Khmelevsky via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Aug 5 05:02:04 PDT 2024
https://github.com/yota9 created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101964
Follow the logic of https://reviews.llvm.org/D143887 patch (fixed later
by #71377) we don't want to remove nops in non-simple function just in
case there is undetected jump table to minimize chances to break offsets
in it.
>From 0a6b73be859b0131b4ee1b221ad5b1058af7c648 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vladislav Khmelevsky <och95 at yandex.ru>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2024 15:57:06 +0400
Subject: [PATCH] [BOLT][NFC] Don't remove nops in non-simple functions
Follow the logic of https://reviews.llvm.org/D143887 patch (fixed later
by #71377) we don't want to remove nops in non-simple function just in
case there is undetected jump table to minimize chances to break offsets
in it.
---
bolt/lib/Passes/BinaryPasses.cpp | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/bolt/lib/Passes/BinaryPasses.cpp b/bolt/lib/Passes/BinaryPasses.cpp
index fa95ad7324ac1..fbbbe1e05df2c 100644
--- a/bolt/lib/Passes/BinaryPasses.cpp
+++ b/bolt/lib/Passes/BinaryPasses.cpp
@@ -1923,7 +1923,7 @@ Error RemoveNops::runOnFunctions(BinaryContext &BC) {
};
ParallelUtilities::PredicateTy SkipFunc = [&](const BinaryFunction &BF) {
- return BF.shouldPreserveNops();
+ return BF.shouldPreserveNops() || (!opts::StrictMode && !BF.isSimple());
};
ParallelUtilities::runOnEachFunction(
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list