[clang] [llvm] [OpenMP] OpenMP 5.1 "assume" directive parsing support (PR #92731)

[Alexey Bataev via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -9193,6 +9207,63 @@ StmtResult TreeTransform<Derived>::TransformOMPExecutableDirective(
       AssociatedStmt.get(), D->getBeginLoc(), D->getEndLoc());
 }
 
+/// This is mostly the same as above, but allows 'informational' class
+/// directives when rebuilding the stmt.  It still takes an
+/// OMPExecutableDirective-type argument because we're reusing that as the
+/// superclass for the 'assume' directive at present, instead of defining a
+/// mostly-identical OMPInformationalDirective parent class.
+template <typename Derived>
+StmtResult TreeTransform<Derived>::TransformOMPInformationalDirective(
+    OMPExecutableDirective *D) {
+
+  // Transform the clauses
+  llvm::SmallVector<OMPClause *, 16> TClauses;
+  ArrayRef<OMPClause *> Clauses = D->clauses();
+  TClauses.reserve(Clauses.size());
+  for (ArrayRef<OMPClause *>::iterator I = Clauses.begin(), E = Clauses.end();
+       I != E; ++I) {
----------------
alexey-bataev wrote:

```suggestion
  for (OMPClause *C : Clauses) {
```

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92731