[llvm] [SimplifyCFG] Don't limit the number of simultaneous forwards from switch condition (PR #95932)

via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jun 20 01:33:14 PDT 2024

Previous message: [llvm] [SimplifyCFG] Don't limit the number of simultaneous forwards from switch condition (PR #95932)
Next message: [llvm] [SimplifyCFG] Forward indirect switch condition value if it can help fold the PHI (PR #95932)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

DianQK wrote:

In this PR, I will change it to forward when it finds phi folding, which aligns more with SimplifyCFG behavior.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95932

Previous message: [llvm] [SimplifyCFG] Don't limit the number of simultaneous forwards from switch condition (PR #95932)
Next message: [llvm] [SimplifyCFG] Forward indirect switch condition value if it can help fold the PHI (PR #95932)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the llvm-commits mailing list