[llvm] [GISel][RISCV]Implement indirect parameter passing (PR #95429)

[Gábor Spaits via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -845,32 +908,49 @@ bool CallLowering::handleAssignments(ValueHandler &Handler,
                                      DstMPO, DstAlign, SrcMPO, SrcAlign,
                                      MemSize, VA);
         }
-        continue;
-      }
-
-      assert(!VA.needsCustom() && "custom loc should have been handled already");
-
-      if (i == 0 && !ThisReturnRegs.empty() &&
-          Handler.isIncomingArgumentHandler() &&
-          isTypeIsValidForThisReturn(ValVT)) {
+        // QUESTION: How to keep this assert with the new if then else
+        // structured code?
+        // assert(!VA.needsCustom() && "custom loc should have been handled
+        // already");
+
+      } else if (i == 0 && !ThisReturnRegs.empty() &&
+                 Handler.isIncomingArgumentHandler() &&
+                 isTypeIsValidForThisReturn(ValVT) && VA.isRegLoc()) {
         Handler.assignValueToReg(ArgReg, ThisReturnRegs[Part], VA);
-        continue;
-      }
-
-      if (Handler.isIncomingArgumentHandler())
+      } else if (Handler.isIncomingArgumentHandler() && VA.isRegLoc()) {
         Handler.assignValueToReg(ArgReg, VA.getLocReg(), VA);
-      else {
+      } else if (VA.isRegLoc()) {
----------------
spaits wrote:

What do you think, is it ok to restructure the existing code this much? Or I should bring back the original structure and at the end of every branch I should do a check if we want to `break` or `continue`?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95429