[llvm] [SDAG] Don't transfer !range metadata without noundef to SDAG (PR #95153)

[Matt Arsenault via llvm-commits]

arsenm wrote:

> This makes little sense to me given that we want to phase out `!range` on calls, so I don't think there is valid in adding support for the `!range` metadata + noundef attribute combination _now_.

I mean if it exists now, it should be handled now. The time to "want to phase out" could be anything from weeks to years 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95153