[llvm] [X86][CodeGen] Support lowering for CCMP/CTEST (PR #91747)
Shengchen Kan via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun May 26 19:04:12 PDT 2024
================
@@ -49217,6 +49228,147 @@ static SDValue combineBMILogicOp(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
return SDValue();
}
+static SDValue combineX86SubCmpForFlags(SDNode *N, SDValue Flag,
+ SelectionDAG &DAG,
+ TargetLowering::DAGCombinerInfo &DCI,
+ const X86Subtarget &ST) {
+ // cmp(setcc(cc, X), 0)
+ // brcond ne
+ // ->
+ // X
+ // brcond cc
+
+ // sub(setcc(cc, X), 1)
+ // brcond ne
+ // ->
+ // X
+ // brcond ~cc
+ //
+ // if only flag has users
+
+ SDValue SetCC = N->getOperand(0);
+
+ // TODO: Remove the check hasCCMP() and update the non-APX tests.
+ if (!ST.hasCCMP() || SetCC.getOpcode() != X86ISD::SETCC || !Flag.hasOneUse())
+ return SDValue();
+
+ // Check the only user of flag is `brcond ne`.
+ SDNode *BrCond = *Flag->uses().begin();
+ if (BrCond->getOpcode() != X86ISD::BRCOND)
+ return SDValue();
----------------
KanRobert wrote:
Is there such a limitation? Starting from the SUB/CMP seems more intuitive to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91747
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list