[llvm] [VPlan] First step towards VPlan cost modeling. (PR #67934)

[via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -7395,6 +7396,177 @@ LoopVectorizationPlanner::plan(ElementCount UserVF, unsigned UserIC) {
   return VF;
 }
 
+static InstructionCost
+computeCostForRecipe(VPRecipeBase *R, ElementCount VF,
+                     SmallPtrSetImpl<Instruction *> &SeenUI,
+                     LoopVectorizationCostModel &CM,
+                     const TargetTransformInfo &TTI, VPCostContext CostCtx) {
+  Instruction *UI = nullptr;
+  if (auto *S = dyn_cast<VPSingleDefRecipe>(R))
+    UI = dyn_cast_or_null<Instruction>(S->getUnderlyingValue());
+  if (UI && (CM.VecValuesToIgnore.contains(UI) || !SeenUI.insert(UI).second))
+    return 0;
+
+  InstructionCost RecipeCost = R->computeCost(VF, CostCtx);
+  if (!RecipeCost.isValid()) {
+    if (auto *IG = dyn_cast<VPInterleaveRecipe>(R)) {
+      RecipeCost = CM.getInstructionCost(IG->getInsertPos(), VF).first;
+    } else if (auto *WidenMem = dyn_cast<VPWidenMemoryRecipe>(R)) {
+      RecipeCost = CM.getInstructionCost(&WidenMem->getIngredient(), VF).first;
+    } else if (UI) {
+      RecipeCost = CM.getInstructionCost(UI, VF).first;
+    } else
+      return 0;
+  }
+  if (ForceTargetInstructionCost.getNumOccurrences() > 0 &&
+      RecipeCost.isValid())
+    RecipeCost = InstructionCost(ForceTargetInstructionCost);
+
+  LLVM_DEBUG({
+    dbgs() << "Cost of " << RecipeCost << " for VF " << VF << ": ";
+    R->dump();
+  });
+  return RecipeCost;
+}
+
+static InstructionCost computeCostForReplicatorRegion(
+    VPRegionBlock *Region, ElementCount VF,
+    SmallPtrSetImpl<Instruction *> &SeenUI, LoopVectorizationCostModel &CM,
+    const TargetTransformInfo &TTI, LLVMContext &Ctx, VPCostContext CostCtx) {
+  using namespace llvm::VPlanPatternMatch;
+  InstructionCost RegionCost = 0;
+  assert(Region->isReplicator() &&
+         "can only compute cost for a replicator region");
+  VPBasicBlock *Then =
+      cast<VPBasicBlock>(Region->getEntry()->getSuccessors()[0]);
+  for (VPRecipeBase &R : *Then)
+    RegionCost += computeCostForRecipe(&R, VF, SeenUI, CM, CM.TTI, CostCtx);
+
+  // Note the cost estimates below closely match the current legacy cost model.
+  auto *BOM =
+      cast<VPBranchOnMaskRecipe>(&Region->getEntryBasicBlock()->front());
+  VPValue *Cond = BOM->getOperand(0);
+
+  // Check if Cond is a uniform compare.
+  auto IsUniformCompare = [Cond]() {
+    VPValue *Op = Cond;
+    if (match(Op, m_Not(m_VPValue())))
+      Op = Op->getDefiningRecipe()->getOperand(0);
+    auto *R = Op->getDefiningRecipe();
+    if (!R)
+      return true;
+    if (!match(R, m_Binary<Instruction::ICmp>(m_VPValue(), m_VPValue())))
+      return false;
+    return all_of(R->operands(), [](VPValue *Op) {
+      return vputils::isUniformAfterVectorization(Op);
+    });
+  }();
+  bool IsHeaderMaskOrUniformCond =
+      IsUniformCompare ||
+      match(Cond, m_ActiveLaneMask(m_VPValue(), m_VPValue())) ||
+      match(Cond, m_Binary<Instruction::ICmp>(m_VPValue(), m_VPValue())) ||
+      isa<VPActiveLaneMaskPHIRecipe>(Cond);
+  if (IsHeaderMaskOrUniformCond || VF.isScalable())
+    return RegionCost;
+
+  // For the scalar case, we may not always execute the original predicated
+  // block, Thus, scale the block's cost by the probability of executing it.
+  // blockNeedsPredication from Legal is used so as to not include all blocks in
+  // tail folded loops.
+  if (VF.isScalar())
+    return RegionCost / getReciprocalPredBlockProb();
+
+  // Add the cost for branches around scalarized and predicated blocks.
+  TTI::TargetCostKind CostKind = TTI::TCK_RecipThroughput;
+  auto *Vec_i1Ty = VectorType::get(IntegerType::getInt1Ty(Ctx), VF);
+  return RegionCost +
+         TTI.getScalarizationOverhead(
+             Vec_i1Ty, APInt::getAllOnes(VF.getFixedValue()),
+             /*Insert*/ false, /*Extract*/ true, CostKind) +
+         (TTI.getCFInstrCost(Instruction::Br, CostKind) * VF.getFixedValue());
+}
+
+InstructionCost LoopVectorizationPlanner::computeCost(VPlan &Plan,
+                                                      ElementCount VF) {
+  InstructionCost Cost = 0;
+  SmallPtrSet<Instruction *, 8> SeenUI;
+  LLVMContext &Ctx = OrigLoop->getHeader()->getContext();
+  VPCostContext CostCtx(CM.TTI, Legal->getWidestInductionType(), Ctx);
+
+  // Cost modeling for inductions is inaccurate in the legacy cost model
+  // compared to the recipes that are generated. To match here initially during
+  // VPlan cost model bring up directly use the induction costs from the legacy
----------------
ayalz wrote:

nit: add a TODO prefix to fix later?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67934