[llvm] [ValueTracking] Handle non-canonical operand order in `isImpliedCondICmps` (PR #85575)

[via llvm-commits]

goldsteinn wrote:

> This patch seems to break minmax idiom: [dtcxzyw/llvm-opt-benchmark#421 (comment)](https://github.com/dtcxzyw/llvm-opt-benchmark/pull/421#discussion_r1527819200)

Its not really this change that breaking it, this patch is providing information that causes a fold to break it no?
Either way, Ill look into it tomorrow.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85575