[lld] [LLD] Use uint64_t timestamp to overcome potential overflow (PR #81665)

[Jinsong Ji via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -1714,7 +1714,8 @@ void elf::postScanRelocations() {
         if (!sym.isDefined()) {
           replaceWithDefined(sym, *in.plt,
                              target->pltHeaderSize +
-                                 target->pltEntrySize * sym.getPltIdx(),
+                                 (uint64_t)target->pltEntrySize *
+                                     sym.getPltIdx(),
----------------
jsji wrote:

You are right, the changes in ELF are unrelated to COFF changes. 
Put them in the same PR because they are from the same report.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81665