[lld] [LLD] Use uint64_t timestamp to overcome potential overflow (PR #81665)

[Martin Storsjö via llvm-commits]

mstorsjo wrote:

> > I do not know what "potential overflow within some expressions are" you refer to, you need to elaborate on exactly what overflows you refer to.
> 
> Thanks @mstorsjo for the quick review. These are flagged by static analyzers, yes, my understanding is the "potential overflow" is referring to values coming from 64bit time_t.

Well if there is an issue pointed out by a static analyzer, you'll need to provide us with information about what those are, and where. We can't really say anything about how to proceed based on the information given, with just loose claims of some potential overflows somewhere.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81665